What does not typically fall under the consequences of cooperative purchasing?

The correct answer highlights a consequence that is less commonly associated with cooperative purchasing initiatives. Cooperative purchasing generally aims to streamline procurement processes by combining the purchasing power of multiple entities, which can lead to several typical consequences.

When organizations engage in cooperative purchasing, they often experience benefits such as cost savings and streamlined procurement processes, but there can also be challenges. Disorganization in procurement processes may arise due to multiple entities involved, each with different procedures and requirements. Difficulty making changes is also a potential issue, as stakeholders might need to reach a consensus, complicating alterations to contracts or procurement strategies. Additionally, time constraints on planning efforts are frequently encountered, as aligning the interests and schedules of various parties can extend the planning phase.

In contrast, vendor issues in cooperative purchasing tend to be less frequent. Since cooperative purchasing involves established agreements with vendors who are accustomed to managing larger contracts, these issues often arise less frequently compared to individual purchasing scenarios. Thus, while other consequences are common in cooperative purchasing efforts, vendor issues are generally rare, making this the correct choice in identifying what does not typically fall under the consequences of cooperative purchasing.